Skip to main content

Reduce – Sustainable Emissions
Summary

Reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, eliminating them, decarbonizing our fossil fuel infrastructure and eliminating emissions from agriculture and forest abuses, net zero, carbon neutral, low carbon, carbon free, renewable, emissions mitigation; creating a sustainable emissions future – these things have failed for 30 years. Since 1990 when scientists started significantly suggesting we reduce greenhouse gas emissions they have not decreased, but increased by 75 percent. Why has this reversal of the cure for climate pollution happened, and what does it mean?

Since the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Reports from their first session starting in 1990, they have warned us that delay would create scenarios where emissions reduction or elimination alone would not be able to control warming. This is now happening with activation of Earth systems degradation or tipping as it is known in climate culture. There has been global agreement agreement since the 1990s that emissions reductions are needed, but this has not happened because of the difficulty of limiting the single thing that is responsible for increasing the population of this planet from 1 billion to nearly 8 billion, and from increasing life expectancy from about 30 years to over 70 years: fossil fuels.

The big challenge with climate now is creating awareness that there is a new critical path that future emissions can hardly touch because future emissions only address future warming. It is current warming that has allowed tipping to activate. Future emissions reductions can help lower our climate’s temperature by reducing the amount of removal of existing excess greenhouse gases in our atmosphere, and reducing the amount of temporary emergency cooling that is needed, but the amount is small. compared to the tasks of cooling and removal that must be accomplished before the point of no return of irreversible tipping collapses.

There remains a truth with human-caused greenhouse gas emissions; that without a sustainable greenhouse gas emissions future, humanity can expect degradation, but this is a long-term issue. The critical path is now the short term and the point of no return that most tipping science says is about mid-century for already activated tipping elements.

This discussion will not offer any magic to reverse the course of global emissions, this subject is covered in great depth and quantity elsewhere, but it will try and create awareness of the meaning of our actions to create future emissions reductions or elimination, so we can understand the critical path to climate change safety, and eventually create a sustainable civilization.

Emissions Reductions
Not Enough

Reduce – Sustainable Emissions – Detailed Discussion

The Hardest Thing Our Advanced Culture Has Ever Attempted

Emissions reductions may be the hardest thing our culture has ever attempted. Gains in reduced emissions in developed nations have largely been from fuel switching to natural gas, and from offshoring of goods and services where the emissions from offshored goods and services are assigned to the country where they are produced, not to where they are consumed.

Literally thousands of the smartest scientists in the world told us over thirty years ago that we needed to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions or suffer the consequences. Instead, cumulative global CO2 emissions since 1990 are ten percent more than from 1960 to 1990.

Thirty years ago we were supposed to have reduced total 1990 greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent  globally by 2020 according to the Kyoto Protocol that included fossil fuels, forests, agriculture and other land uses and abuses. Twenty percent below 1990 levels was 26.2 Gt CO2 equivalents in 2020.  In 2023 we emitted 53 Gt CO2 equivalents or 102 percent more than our 2020 target, not 20 percent less.

Since 1990 we were supposed to have been reducing emissions. Instead, emissions have only increased. Humankind has added as much CO2 to our atmosphere since 1990 as we added in the previous 140 years.

Why have we increased our emissions when we were supposed to have reduced them?  Could it be that the most important thing that humanity has ever done, that the vast majority of our lives depend upon, is just too hard to give up? Impossible is a better concept, at least in time frames that matter to climate pollution and its destructive effects on our Earth systems.

Hard to Abate Sectors

We can certainly give up fossil fuels at some point, but 40 percent of all fossil fuel emissions are from hard to abate industrial sectors. Literally, these industrial processes mostly require flames to create oxidation reactions. Electrical resistance heat from renewable energy does not create the flames that create the oxidation reactions. Another 20 percent of all emissions come from agriculture, forestry and other land uses and abuses. These emissions too, are extremely hard to abate. In total, 60 percent of all of humankind’s emissions cannot be eliminated in time frames that matter.

Sustainability of our world, of our natural world from which we humans draw all things, sustainability is paramount. Without sustainability, at some time in our future is in doubt. We will run out, pollute, and over stress so many of our systems that we rely upon that they will collapse.

We as a global culture have made small gains in efficiency of greenhouse gas emissions and renewable energy, but they are still very small, and only a small part of the 40 percent of greenhouse gas emissions that we could possibly eliminate in time frames that matter.

Why are emissions continuing to climb? Fuels Switching, Offshoring, and Renewables

Western nations’ emissions are decreasing, because of fuel switching from coal to less carbon intensive natural gas, from offshoring of goods and services, and from renewable energy. The bottom line with our emissions reductions, is that fuel switching and offshoring of emissions are responsible for over 80 percent of the decline in US emissions.

US Emissions have fallen by 20 percent (about 1,200 million tons CO2) since peaking around the turn of the century, but US offshored emissions have increased by 500 million tons CO2.  The shift from coal to natural gas has resulted in a reduction of emissions of another 500 million tons CO2, leaving renewables and other emissions efficiencies at only a reduction of less than 20 percent of the total decline.  Part of this small amount of decline from renewables is because natural gas energy production has more than tripled since the turn of the century as the U.S. continues to increase their energy demand.

Renewable energy in the U.S. accounted for 21 percent of total energy generation in 2023, up from 9 percent in 2005. This accounts for 30 percent of US emissions decline since 2005. Fuel switching from coal to much lower carbon intensity natural gas though, is responsible for 65 percent of the emissions decline in the U.S. since 2005; more than twice the decline of renewable energy. This has occurred while energy consumption in the U.S. has increased nearly 50 percent.

Developing nations increased energy demand, and increased energy demand in developed nations are responsible for causing emissions to continue to increase and of course this is only fair. We in developed nations have ours, why should they not have theirs? There is great inequity in assuming that developing nations can reduce their emissions as easily as developed nations.  It is relatively easy for developed nations to switch to lower carbon intensive energy sources, but not so in developed nations. To even vaguely approach the energy intensity of developed nations, which is of course the goal to live a higher standard life in developing nations, these nations must not only implement renewable infrastructure, they must implement transmission infrastructure as well. In the US from 2003 to 2023, we easily spent three times as much on energy transmission and distribution infrastructure as we spent on generation.

Emissions Reductions Help, But They Cannot Prevent Our Climate From Passing the Point of No return

Very importantly, there is now a challenging distinction between sustainability behaviors and climate change: Earth’s climate tipping systems have now been activated, like almost every climate impact  –generations to a century ahead of schedule.

More than half of known tipping systems are now active when they were not supposed to activate until with business emissions in the latter half of the 21st century or after 2100. These “activations” are deeply tied to Earth systems collapses, like from fire, drought, flood, windstorm, sea ice loss, ice sheet collapse, permafrost collapse, Gulf Stream shutdown, sea level rise, barrier island erosion, coral collapse, etc. Once these collapses begin, like with any collapse, they do not self-restore unless the perturbation (warming or climate change effects) that created the collapse is removed.

About half of these systems collapses have feedback relationship with other Earth systems that increase the speed and extremeness of their collapses. Most of these tipping collapses have activation periods and then what is labelled in findings as “the point of no return,” where the collapse become self-perpetuating even if the perturbation is removed.

The result of these collapses is that right now, Amazon collapse has flipped the Amazon from carbon sink to carbon source with emissions of 1 gigaton greenhouse gases per year. Canadian forest have flipped with emissions of 250 million tons emissions per year and permafrost has flipped with emissions of 2.3 gigatons per year, and as go these subcontinental scale ecologies, likely go similar ecologies globally. These collapses have just begun and have a capacity to increase nonlinearly and far more than they have collapsed so far, enough to dwarf our excess human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. This scenario that is playing out right now, that is unstoppable unless we reduce the amount of carbon in the sky, of which annual emissions are only a small part, will create existential futures for the human civilization without climate restoration.

These collapses can be stabilized, but only if we restore Earth’s climate back to within the evolutionary boundaries of her systems that are now in collapse, and only if this restoration happens before the point of no return. Because the maximum average temperature of our old climate, or the evolutionary boundaries of our Earth systems, was about 1 degree C warming above the late 19th century, to stabilize these collapses we must return Earth’s climate to lower than 1 degree C warming, where we are 1.6 degrees C today.

Fundamentally then, complete future emissions cessation allows activated tipping collapses to complete. Future emissions do matter, but atmospheric carbon removal matters a lot more. Total human emissions since 1850 are about 2,700 gigatons CO2, whereas annual emissions are about 50 Gt CO2.

The fundamental conundrum then is that emissions reductions are not working, and the time it is going to take to remove the excess greenhouse gases from our atmosphere could exceed the time we have remaining until the point of no return. To prevent collapse of our Earth systems with additional natural feedback emissions of greenhouse gases that dwarf humankind’s, we must now cool our climate on an urgent emergency basis through engineered solutions, so that we can buy time to remove excess greenhouse gases from our atmosphere and create a sustainable greenhouse gas emissions future.

REFERENCES

Global Emissions… since 1990 ten percent more than from 1960 to 1990.
Friedlingstein et al., Global Carbon Budget 2024, March 14, 2025.
https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/17/965/2025/essd-17-965-2025-discussion.html

Kyoto Protocol…

CO2 equivalents… The second commitment period for the Kyoto Agreement was generally 20 percent reduction in all greenhouse gas emissions, including forests, agriculture and other land uses, below 1990 levels by 2020, or 30.4 Gt CO2eq. In 2023 we emitted 53 Gt CO2 eq or 75% more than 1990, not 20 percent less. This is 120 percent more than we were supposed to be emitting today.

What is the Kyoto Protocol? UNFCCC
https://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol#:~:text=During%20the%20second%20commitment%20period,is%20different%20from%20the%20first.

Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol… The Doha Amendment is the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol 2012 to 2020. It shows general commitments to reduce all greenhouse gas emissions including forests agriculture and other land uses 80 percent of the base year of 1990.
https://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/kp_doha_amendment_english.pdf

1990 and 2023 emissions, Edgar 32.6 and 53 Gt CO2eq https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2024

Emissions have only increased… Humankind has added as much CO2 to our atmosphere as we added in the previous 140 years.
2024 CO2 = 428 ppm
1990 CO2 = 354 ppm
1850 CO2 = 280 ppm
Mauna Loa CO2 – https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/

Hard to decarbonize sectors, Brookings Institute… “Heavy industry makes products that are central to our modern way of life but is also responsible for nearly 40% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Steel, cement, and chemicals are the top three emitting industries and are among the most difficult to decarbonize, owing to technical factors like the need for very high heat and process emissions of carbon dioxide, and economic factors including low profit margins, capital intensity, long asset life, and trade exposure.”
Gross, The Challenge of Decarbonizing Heavy Industry, Brookings Institute, 2021.
https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/FP_20210623_industrial_gross_v2.pdf

Offshored emissions… Offshore emissions are emissions made abroad through production of goods or services consumed at home. In the US, they have increased by ten times since about the turn of the century to over 500 million tons CO2.
Global Carbon Project
https://globalcarbonatlas.org/emissions/carbon-emissions/

Fuel switching… “In 2005, 9% of the electricity generated in the United States came from renewable sources. The renewable share of generation rose to 18% in 2019, largely driven by growth in wind and solar generation. Nuclear generation, a zero-emission energy source, made up about 20% of U.S. generation in both 2005 and 2019.

Although both the increased use of renewables and the shift from coal-fired to natural gas-fired generation contributed to reductions in electric power sector CO2 emissions, the shift from coal to natural gas had a larger effect. Of the 819 million metric ton decline in CO2 emissions from 2005 to 2019, approximately 248 million metric tons (30%) of that decline is attributable to the increase in renewable generation. In comparison, almost 532 million metric tons (65%) of the decline in CO2 emissions is attributable to the shift from coal-fired to natural gas-fired electricity generation. Decreased petroleum-fired generation largely influenced the remaining decrease in CO2 emissions.”

Electric power sector CO2 emissions drop as generation mix shifts from coal to natural gas, Today in Energy, EIA, June 9, 2021.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=48296#:~:text=The%20renewable%20share%20of%20generation,natural%20gas%2Dfired%20generation%20efficiency.

US Renewable Energy generation percentage in 2023, EIA…
https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

Electrical Generation, Transmission and Distribution Infrastructure costs 2003 to 2023…
Grid infrastructure investments drive increase in utility spending over last two decades, today in Energy, EIA, November 18, 2024.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=63724

Healthy Planet Action Coalition

An international group of climate scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, and policy and advocacy experts

Terms of Use | Privacy PolicyContact
We are an international organization located on Planet Earth, third planet from our sun in the Milky Way Galaxy.
Website design and all images and video by Bruce Melton unless otherwise attributed – free use with permission.
V2 Beta Site – See the old site here.